Making a reasoned decision on fish

Our view: Science — not politics or practicality — should dictate fisheries policy.
2013-10-17T09:57:00Z Making a reasoned decision on fish Coos Bay World
October 17, 2013 9:57 am

What would you get if you mixed a feral dog with a wolf in the wild? What would the offspring be like? And what if you did that again and again and again . . .

That’s basically what state fish biologists and fishery user groups are arguing about, and will be until the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Commission makes a decision early next year whether to curb or curtail salmon hatcheries.

Biologists are concerned about breeding between hatchery fish and wild stocks. Lots of research suggests the mingling produces a strain of wild offspring that are less hardy. That means human intervention – the hatchery – has harmed the natural species.

Of course, there’s research that says just the opposite. That’s why user groups, such as the South Coast Angler’s Salmon Trout Enhancement Program (S.T.E.P.) are troubled by the hatchery shut-down proposals being considered.

“That’s the whole problem,” South Coast Anglers S.T.E.P. President Bruce Bertrand told us earlier this week. “They say there’s a chance it might cause a problem. But where’s the science to back it up?”

There are other reasons the group is concerned, too, starting with an estimated $4.6 million per year that salmon and steelhead harvests bring to South Coast communities, according to the visitor promotional organization Travel Oregon.

A quite different concern comes from fisheries biologist James Lichatowich. He’s studied salmon for 40 years and recently published “Salmon, People, and Place: A Biologist’s Search for Salmon Recovery.”

Lichatowich sees validity in the state’s plans to restrict mixing of wild and hatchery stocks. The plan calls for establishing strict ratios of wild versus hatchery stock in the rivers. But he thinks the state’s  plan falls short because there’s no clear plan to evaluate the health of the salmon after the hatcheries are closed.

“Basically, we’re trying to get by on the cheap,” Lichatowich told us.

Our concern is that once again in the conflict between conservation and desire to use the land may come down to politics and practicality, not science.

Copyright 2016 Coos Bay World. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

    Report Abuse
    BANDONMAN - October 19, 2013 12:40 pm
    ODF&W has been trying to undermine the STEP program since its inception. starting with fish biologists setting hatch boxes in the wrong place to curtailing the amount of eggs the hatcheries got. ODF&W has been wrong more than right (clearing streams) for example. Bottom line is that STEP produces more fish at lest cost than the State people do. Leave them alone for cryin out loud!
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Content Match