Their venture couldn’t have ended much worse.

Ammon Bundy and 10 of his cohorts are now jailed and facing federal indictments following occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge earlier last month. Another of their group is dead, killed by federal agents who say he was going for a gun. No matter what authorities say — Robert “LaVoy” Finicum is now a martyr for the cause.

Four more protestors remain holed up at the refuge headquarters, demanding that they be allowed to walk away clean. According to one Associated Press story this week, one of them, 27-year-old David Fry of Ohio, said he and the others are: “… waiting for some kind of miracle to happen.”

And now, in response to unspecified concerns, more security officers are being dispatched to wildlife refuges in Klamath Basin, Ash Meadows in Nevada and the Modoc refuge in northern California.

"No specific threats or incidents have occurred, but we remain vigilant to ensure employee and visitor safety throughout the region," Jody Holzworth, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

This can’t be the outcome that Bundy and his supporters had hoped for when they drove onto the refuge Jan. 2 with their guns and their demands. The occupation was woefully ill-prepared and quickly became a pathetic display of poor planning and disorganization.

The result was that the group’s message, to protest federal management of vast expanses of land in Western states, was lost in an atmosphere of tragic opera. The characters — Bundy, Finicum and the others — became the story, not their cause.

Federal land management is a serious issue, and it’s not a simple one. It involves basic questions about who owns the land and what is proper stewardship. Who defines highest and best use of land? Can those definitions change from generation to generation?

The answers involve not just economic considerations, but issues of culture and traditional use. There needs to be a balance struck between stakeholders, all of whom want different things from the same resource.

But those answers won’t come from the business end of a weapon. Tragically, that’s the lesson Bundy and his group ended up giving us when they carried guns onto the refuge.

(3) comments


I hope these gun-toting, anti-gummint yahoos realize that many other gun owners would much rather help defend an imperfect democratic system than turn it over to such incoherent fruitcakes? Heck, even a Republican controlled government is preferable to their nightmare scenario!


The thing that amazed me about this incident is they are calling the people arrested Domestic Terrorists. They prosecuted the Father and Son who started the fires which sparked the refuge stand off as Domestic Terrorists. There was a Coos Bay Contractor prosecuted for defrauding the Government. One charge was selling critical improper parts to the DOD for helicopters our military men and women fly in. That seems a lot more like Terrorism to me than what the ranchers did. The ranchers got far more jail time and some of the Coos Bay Contractors sentenced have still not served their time. Seems to me something is wrong with the system.


Unless Oregon State Police are considered Federal Agents, your editorial is technically wrong, Finicum was killed by OSP.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.