Let's shed some light on LNG


Thursday, July 09, 2009 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news

Related Links

LNG is a natural gas that has been transformed into a liquid state so it can be shipped between areas without an overland gas pipeline connection. LNG, therefore, requires import/export terminals where it can be transferred from transport ships to land pipelines and reconstituted from a liquid state to a gaseous state. There are currently three proposals under consideration for building LNG import terminals in Oregon. Two along the lower Columbia River and one at Coos Bay.

Citizens Utility Board, of which I am a member, is opposed to the development of these terminals for a number of reasons. At present, there is no market need to warrant the construction of these terminals. Natural gas imported into the state over the past two years has traded at one-fourth to one-half the price of the LNG international price. Oregon consumers would not see any benefit from importing higher-priced gas than what’s available here. Also, these terminals could be modified to export American natural gas to the global LNG market, forcing Oregon utilities and their customers to pay rates competitive with more expensive overseas markets. This international connection would not serve any local needs seeing that Oregon’s natural gas supply already outstrips its demand, but terminals could significantly drive up Oregon’s gas prices. In either direction the flow of natural gas through Oregon to the international market is likely to inflate prices for consumers.

Economic analysis aside, LNG import terminals are an undesirable option for a much more basic reason: the health and safety of the community. LNG terminals have the potential to cause substantial environmental damage through gas leakage and increase carbon dioxide emissions from tankers and the conversion process.

LNG import terminals should have no place in Oregon. According to a recent Oregon Department of Energy Review, our state already has access to plenty of low-cost domestic natural gas. Oregon could get more at a lower cost than imported LNG with a new pipeline emerging from the Rocky Mountains. We repeat, imported LNG runs the risks of increased energy costs and environmental contamination that could take a toll health wise. Let’s keep Oregon a desirable place that promotes safe, low-cost and environmentally conscious energy development and voice your opposition to LNG terminals.

Louise Mincer

Port Orford




Previous

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Common Sense wrote on Jul 14, 2009 7:37 AM:

I agree 100% with you Louise,

If Lng at Jordon Cove offers no full time jobs to locals as Bob Braddock has said publically (Bringing in outsiders to fill the 35-40 jobs) & has many negative reasons to NOT have it,
Examples:
A. Air polluter 24/7/365 days a year,
B. Would discourage many visitors & retiree's from visiting/living here,
C. Lng is OVER 2 times more expensive then what Oregon citizens are paying right now for natural gas,
D. Lng ship having a government study proven fact of a 2 mile hizard zone coming within 1/2 of populated area here affecting 17,000 people,
E. Pipeline of 230 miles that could leak & catch fire due to lightening or ordinary camp fire etc,
F. Forcing 400 Oregon property owners to lose 80 foot wide section of their land,
& the negative list can go on & on!

Basically, it's a great deal for the few profiting from it, but a no brainer for the majority of Oregon citizens on why this should never come to Oregon period! Get educated & you'll say NO to!

Dragonman wrote on Jul 10, 2009 5:52 PM:

LNG? As soon as we say no, every car in this country, home, lawnmower will run on this stuff. ......Or not...Who knows what the future holds, everything is trading at 1/4 of its value. To me this is no reason to run from the future. We all know what’s going on yesterday, but what is the long term plan, what is the futures looking like. How do we know this isn’t another good idea that narrow minded people want to shut down. I’m just saying I’m confused and would hate to blow a great deal for Coos Bay.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections