Sen. Johnson: LNG tanks could be an aviation hazard


Wednesday, August 20, 2008 | 3 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
WARRENTON (AP) — An Oregon state senator says a liquefied natural gas plant at Warrenton on the Oregon coast could endanger planes using a nearby airport, and federal authorities have been asked to rule on the question.

The facility proposed at Warrenton’s Skipanon Peninsula would have 195-foot-tall storage tanks, and they would protrude into the air space around the Astoria Regional Airport, said Sen. Betsy Johnson, D-Scappoose, a licensed commercial pilot.

The project includes three tanks, each about the height of a 17-story building and nearly as wide as a football field is long. The tanks would hold the supercooled liquid delivered by ship to the facility, which would reheat the gas to a vapor and distribute it via pipeline.

The LNG facility proposed for Coos Bay’s North Spit, less than half a mile across the bay from the Southwest Oregon Regional Airport, would feature two LNG tanks. Jordan Cove Energy’s project manager, Bob Braddock, has said both would be about 200 feet tall.

Oregon LNG Chief Executive Officer Peter Hansen said even if the tops of the storage tanks near Warrenton do enter protected airspace, he doesn’t think they qualify as a hazard to the airport under federal rules. He submitted an application to the Federal Aviation Administration to determine whether Johnson is right.

“As an experienced pilot, I believe the location and height of the proposed liquefied natural gas tanks are dangerous to the citizens living around the airport, and to the crews that land and take off at the airport,” Johnson wrote earlier this summer to the Port of Astoria Commission, which runs the airport and leases the proposed facility site to Oregon LNG.

She said the terminal could hamper use of the airport and urged port authorities to hold hearings.

“The Port is waiting to see what the FAA has to say,” said its director of operations Ron Larsen. “They’re the ones who make the determination as to whether something like that would be disruptive to the airport. ... They could say it’s perfectly fine, just make sure you put lights on it.”

Larsen said the port didn’t know the LNG storage tanks would be so tall they would enter the protected airspace. Now, he said, it does appear the tops of the tanks will cut into that space.

Hansen submitted an application to the FAA to determine the airport safety issues associated with his development. The review is standard for any tall structure around an airport, whether it’s an LNG storage tank, a windmill or an antennae, he said.

“They are in the process of doing the study,” Hansen said. “We believe the FAA should be left alone to make that determination.”
Tags » LNG
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

NB Resident wrote on Aug 20, 2008 9:00 PM:

Bob Braddock, I agree with COMMON SENSE take your LNG B.S. to a nation where the government does not care about their land or people!!!

sallyport wrote on Aug 20, 2008 2:44 PM:

The flare that will be burning 24/7 is much taller than the tanks. Imagine flying into that in the fog. The old timers will remember that the FAA said the Steag power plant stack offered a hazard and it was five miles down channel. Hope the Coos Bay mayor who supports LNG remembers this one.

Common Sense wrote on Aug 20, 2008 11:31 AM:

Better have a look at the Airport at North Bend, since it's less then a mile from Jordan Cove! Worse then that, the airport is less then a 1/2 mile from a LNG ship that would be delivering LNG to Jordan Cove!

Hey Bob Braddock, it's not lookin good for your California LNG SCAM, better find another state or better...A 3rd world nation that doesn't care about it's land or people...

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | BlogThe World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections